Influential Reading Group Makes It Clear: Students Need
Systematic, Explicit Phonics
EdWeek:
7.18.2019 by Stephen Sawchuk
The
International Literacy Association has put out a new brief endorsing
"systematic and explicit" phonics in all early reading instruction.
"English
is an alphabetic language. We have 26 letters. These letters, in various
combinations, represent the 44 sounds in our language," the ILA brief
released last week reads. "Teaching students the basic letter-sound
combinations gives them access to sounding out approximately 84% of the words
in English print."
It's
a strong statement from an influential, big-tent organization whose members,
which include teachers, researchers, and parents, have traditionally held a
wide range of views on reading approaches.
"
It's
kind of a refreshing piece," said Timothy Shanahan, a professor emeritus
at the University of Illinois at Chicago. "A lot of people think ILA is an
anti-phonics group, but it's a large group."
═════════►
This
may seem like common sense: Of course students need to be taught letters and
sounds. But for any of you who have spent any time in the early-reading
space, it gets right to the heart of the decades-old reading wars.
Almost
all reading researchers agree that factors like motivation, access to a
print-rich environment, and good books matter in a reading program. The reading
wars are really a debate on a small—but critical—piece: The relative importance
of phonics,
sometimes called "decoding."
The
pro-phonics folks tend to view phonics as a bridge to meaning, reasoning that
they're a necessary step toward being able to read any word. Proponents of whole
language or its successor "balanced
literacy," which is a common approach used in U.S. schools today,
generally emphasize meaning first, mixing small-group reading of literature
with lots of student choice of reading materials. Those approaches tend to
subordinate phonics, emphasizing learning words through memorization, context
clues, and pictures. READ MORE >>
No comments:
Post a Comment