America’s Star Libraries: Top-Rated Libraries 2017
Library
Journal: 12.04.2017
by Keith Curry Lance
We
are pleased to announce the results of the tenth edition of
the LJ Index of Public Library Service, sponsored by Baker & Taylor’s
CollectConnect. The LJ Index rates U.S. public libraries based on
selected per capita output measures.
The
2017 Index derives from data recently released by the Institute
of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) for FY15.
This
year, 7,409 U.S. public libraries qualified to be rated in the Index. In this
edition, there are 259 Star Libraries, each receiving three-Star, four-Star, or
five-Star designations.
From
2009 through 2015, the four measures included were circulation, library visits,
program attendance, and public Internet computer use. LJ Index scores
are produced by measuring the proportional relationships between each library’s
statistics and the averages for its expenditure category.
Last
year, circulation of electronic materials, or e-circ, became the fifth
statistic to contribute to a library’s LJ Index score. While we had
hoped to add Wi-Fi sessions this year, that was not to be.
The
2017 Star Libraries are found in 40 states scattered across the country
geographically. The top four states, ranked by their numbers of Star Libraries,
are New York (31), Ohio (25), Illinois (22), and California (13). There is a
tie for fifth place between Kansas and Massachusetts (12 each). The Top Ten
Star Library states are rounded out by Nebraska and Texas (11 each), Alabama
(10), and Colorado (8). Like these Top Ten states, the remaining 30 Star
Library states traverse the nation and are in every major geographical region.
There
are no 2017 Star winners in the District of Columbia or ten states. Of those
ten states, four are the Southern states of Arkansas, Georgia, Mississippi, and
North Carolina. Two other Star-less states are in the Rocky Mountain West—Idaho
and Wyoming—and also Delaware and Hawaii.
In
addition to the above-mentioned states, there were no Star Libraries from
Maryland or Vermont, because circulation of electronic materials or
e-circulation was unreported for all libraries in those states. Consequently,
no libraries in these states were scored on the 2017 LJ Index. READ
MORE >>
See Also: Library Reports & Statistics Page
See Also: Library Reports & Statistics Page
No comments:
Post a Comment